cbeeches
innocent
Don't Worry, be Happy
Posts: 30
|
Post by cbeeches on Nov 27, 2007 7:45:38 GMT -5
An old Friend . Still a good looking watch though not worn much, thought I'd give it some wrist time today.  |
|
|
|
Post by mike on Nov 27, 2007 8:09:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by wcbartlett on Nov 27, 2007 9:32:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by mike on Nov 27, 2007 9:38:56 GMT -5
NICE!!  |
|
|
|
Post by timefinder on Nov 27, 2007 10:28:51 GMT -5
How old is the Gucci? I have not seen that watch in quite some time.
|
|
cbeeches
innocent
Don't Worry, be Happy
Posts: 30
|
Post by cbeeches on Nov 27, 2007 11:56:12 GMT -5
The GUCCI is from 1987. Got it as a Xmas present. Original cost back then was $190.00 I wore it everyday in the late 80's and early 90's. It still really is a good looking watch. I took good care of it, had to replace the strap a few times. Now it mostly sits in the watch box, but I keep the battery fresh always.
|
|
|
|
Post by tbarry on Nov 27, 2007 12:00:25 GMT -5
  Click on images for larger view... My Wittnauer, bought as new old stock in the early '70s. It's probably from the late '50s or early '60s, and is quite large for a gentleman's dress watch of the period, at about 36mm. Gold-filled, hand-wound, non-quick-set date. I only wear it when formality is called for, which is rare in my retirement years. |
|
|
|
Post by boscoe on Nov 27, 2007 12:16:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by AutoMovement on Nov 27, 2007 13:38:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by JBHII on Nov 27, 2007 14:48:22 GMT -5
This one seems to be stealing a lot of wrist time.   |
|
|
|
Post by boscoe on Nov 27, 2007 19:03:11 GMT -5
Switched to this. A rarely worn new friend  |
|
|
|
Post by foghorn on Nov 27, 2007 19:31:07 GMT -5
I rarely wear the Astrographic  |
|
|
|
Post by jeffr on Nov 27, 2007 22:51:20 GMT -5
I rarely wear the Astrographic Wow, great watch Foggy. I've been thinking about this one or the square version. Any regrets on your purchase, or just too many other choices? |
|
|
|
Post by mgiraz on Nov 27, 2007 23:32:52 GMT -5
my old seiko  |
|
