|
Post by johnnycanuck on Oct 21, 2004 9:32:29 GMT -5
As you can see, I finally figured out how to post photos. However, I've noticed a marked degradation in the quality of my pix and the source must be the photo host.
I'm using VillagePhotos. Anyone else notice this? My digi camera is a 5.1 mega pixel and the quality of my pix here look like a 2.1 mp shot.
Can anyone recommend a different photo host?
|
|
|
Post by JBHII on Oct 21, 2004 10:36:57 GMT -5
As you can see, I finally figured out how to post photos. However, I've noticed a marked degradation in the quality of my pix and the source must be the photo host. I'm using VillagePhotos. Anyone else notice this? My digi camera is a 5.1 mega pixel and the quality of my pix here look like a 2.1 mp shot. Can anyone recommend a different photo host? I see a lot of folks using Photobucket (www.photobucket.com). SOME sites will compress the image files they store on their servers. Since .jpg files are already compressed, you can often see a marked degredation in the image quality when this happens. I'm not sure if this is what's happening to you, but you might try two different sites and compare the results you get. John
|
|