|
Post by exxondus on Aug 27, 2007 22:51:21 GMT -5
I noticed that theres a discrepancy between ball webbies made a research via www.ballwatchusa.com since its been noted to be the more updated of the ball sites, and decided to buy the ME II Chronometer LE as it uses the ETA2836-2 instead of the more common ETA2824-2 (since I already have watches using this movement). To my dismay, when i went to www.ballwatch.com to check the specs after buying (just to see if theres updates on the new nighttrain), i notice it states that the Chrnometer LE uses a ETA2824/2 movement instead!! wat a bummer so would like to check, which is the correct info? thanks!
|
|
|
Post by bullosa on Aug 27, 2007 22:57:22 GMT -5
The ME II Chronometer uses ETA 2824-2 while the ME II Chronometer LE uses 2836-2. Notice one is just date while the LE have day/date. There are some typos on their website.
|
|
|
Post by exxondus on Aug 27, 2007 23:07:07 GMT -5
ic okie thanks for the heads ups..
was wondering how come the 2824/2 can have a day together with the date...is this possible?
|
|
|
Post by timefinder on Aug 28, 2007 8:45:26 GMT -5
Jeremy from Ball.......are you around? If so, can you help these gents out?
|
|
|
Post by Jeremy from Ball on Aug 28, 2007 9:02:55 GMT -5
EM Chronometer: 2824 (Date only) EM Chronometer LE: 2836 (Day-Date)
The Ballwatch.com site has a misprint.
|
|
|
Post by exxondus on Aug 28, 2007 10:28:11 GMT -5
thanks everyone for the clarifications.
|
|
|
Post by Time2watch on Aug 28, 2007 11:09:49 GMT -5
As an aside, the 2824 and 2836 are both based on the same base caliber. The difference really is the day feature. Otherwise same movement...
|
|