|
Post by Knight Watchman on Nov 2, 2006 0:28:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by rickatkins on Nov 2, 2006 8:10:05 GMT -5
Hi KW, I'm with you on this one. I couldn't put my finger on it straight away but I think it's the numbers they've used for the hours. It's a real shame because I like the rubber strap/case combination. I like the use of colours. I like the date display idea (althought the upside numbers it creates at the top of the watch creates a mismatch of form for me) and I like the opened aperture for the movement display. A wasted oppportunity. Thanks for sharing. Rick.
|
|
|
Post by GJ on Nov 2, 2006 14:40:04 GMT -5
Indeed it looks like they forgot to pace the dail on the watch... Strange design...
|
|
|
Post by boscoe on Nov 4, 2006 0:46:36 GMT -5
Yup. Beastly!
|
|
|
Post by cofetym on Nov 4, 2006 9:37:34 GMT -5
If anyone has this watch and is tired of looking at it please send it my way. Yes! The dial is busy but I like seeing the movement on automatic watches, so there.
|
|
|
Post by eddie on Dec 13, 2006 21:17:38 GMT -5
Sir Knight..............don't know what to say
|
|