|
Post by falcon4311 on Nov 23, 2007 9:14:14 GMT -5
Everything is going well with the 3824; I am very surprised with its accuracy being a fresh automatic. The only draw back in my opinion is it is a little small for my liking. 42mm is smaller than what I normally wear. Looks wise I think it has a very classy look to it and I can see why it is one of your favourite watches. It has a feel of pure quality and the classic look doesn’t hurt either. Knowing what I know now, only because of the size I would have bought the new Invicta 4468. Either that or if I could find a watch stretcher to make the 3824 bigger I would be even happier. Over all though, I would have to say that if one was to head out to a formal function this watch would out class them all. I want to thank you Rusty for all of your knowledge on this watch, you have been very helpful. I am sure I will end getting a blast from some that own this watch, from what I have heard there are many that are very loyal to the 3824.
|
|
|
Post by amwilliams9 on Nov 23, 2007 9:19:23 GMT -5
Sounds like you should look into the Grand Pro divers 47mm and looks exactly like it's little brother. Or mabe the Ocean Ghost series gotta luv those. Nice presence on the wrist and can actually fit almost any wrist.
|
|
|
Post by Rusty on Nov 23, 2007 9:34:50 GMT -5
Great to hear, falcon. Try posting some pix when you have a chance.
|
|
|
Post by boscoe on Nov 23, 2007 10:34:15 GMT -5
Glad you're happy. Funny, I have a couple watches I'd like to throw into the dryer to SHRINK.
|
|
|
Post by falcon4311 on Nov 23, 2007 16:27:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by falcon4311 on Nov 23, 2007 16:28:18 GMT -5
Way too many reflections, I will try to get some better shots.
|
|
timebender
disciple
Bending a few in time.
Posts: 200
|
Post by timebender on Nov 23, 2007 16:45:23 GMT -5
falcon4311I sent you a PM hoping to help you with you pictures
|
|
|
Post by markdl on Nov 23, 2007 17:47:35 GMT -5
That last shot with the reflection of the camera is very artsy! I say it's the winner of whatever photo contest we have. And I agree the only thing keeping the 3824 from being the perfect watch is 3 or 4mm.
|
|
|
Post by 13echo on Nov 23, 2007 21:04:56 GMT -5
See if your camera has a "macro" function. The macro function allows the camera to focus on an object when it is very close to the lense for tighter shots.....
|
|
|
Post by 13echo on Nov 23, 2007 22:21:01 GMT -5
You found that model "new" recently? Did you purchase it anywhere interesting??
|
|
|
Post by falcon4311 on Nov 24, 2007 0:04:45 GMT -5
Ok, my previous pictures sucked. Timebender assisted me with free photography lessons. I took more pictures and they came out so good that you could see every fingerprint and smudge that was on the watch. I will post some pictures tomorrow when I can take some outdoor pictures again, this time I will polish the watch before I take the shots. 13echo, I just happened to find it on Ebay. Also, I did have the camera set on macro but it has limitations as to how close you can get and still take a clear picture. Timebender suggested that I take the pictures outdoors and to take the shots from a further distance and use the zoom instead of using the macro setting. The shots were amazing, thanks again for the photography lessons. Again it’s a stunning watch but if it was 3mm bigger it would be a thing of perfection! The diamonds are very subtle but in the right light they jump right off the dial. By the way, I’m still waiting to hear from someone with a watch stretcher.
|
|
|
Post by falcon4311 on Nov 24, 2007 1:04:32 GMT -5
One other comment I have to post on this watch is the fact that straight out of the box this factory fresh automatic has maintain perfect time over a 36 hour time period. I mean it has not gained one second!!! I have never heard of that before, I am very impressed.
|
|
timebender
disciple
Bending a few in time.
Posts: 200
|
Post by timebender on Nov 24, 2007 7:42:06 GMT -5
One other comment I have to post on this watch is the fact that straight out of the box this factory fresh automatic has maintain perfect time over a 36 hour time period. I mean it has not gained one second!!! I have never heard of that before, I am very impressed. Looking forward to seeing your pictures. What I told you was the easy way. Your macro setting will still do a great job. You just need to read your instructions and find the minimum focal distance of the lens and not be inside that. One other hint on taking shots outside. A very light overcast day is better than bright sun. It gives you plenty of light that is diffused thus, you do not get the glare and harsh shadows of direct sun light.
|
|
|
Post by Rusty on Nov 24, 2007 8:33:12 GMT -5
Thanks 'bender, for the photo advice.
|
|
|
Post by falcon4311 on Nov 24, 2007 9:05:21 GMT -5
Ditto, Timebenders advice was right on the money. I was shocked at the clarity and detail in the pictures I took. All this time I thought it was my camera when in actuality it was operator error.
|
|