|
|
Post by casuistic on Dec 1, 2007 7:13:35 GMT -5
I own so many watches that have luminous hands and or markers that the few that I own that do not have any lume look like they are missing something. I prefer lume even on a dress watch.
What about you
Just Jack
|
|
|
|
Post by Rusty on Dec 1, 2007 7:17:17 GMT -5
I have three without, one vintage, one with furnace blued hands, and an Invicta S1 automatic that surprised me when it arrives WITHOUT lume.
|
|
|
|
Post by tbarry on Dec 1, 2007 10:28:59 GMT -5
I don't like lume on a dress watch. I prefer it on everything else.
|
|
|
|
Post by Agent Orange on Dec 1, 2007 11:50:12 GMT -5
Only on diver watches, dress or sports.
|
|
|
|
Post by mike on Dec 1, 2007 13:16:24 GMT -5
For a watch used in all conditions lume is a must for me.  |
|
|
|
Post by boscoe on Dec 1, 2007 13:38:25 GMT -5
I like dress watches w/o lume.
|
|
|
|
Post by casyjones3 on Dec 1, 2007 13:56:08 GMT -5
I would prefer lume on all my watches.Also when the lume is applied it should last longer,how about over night.
|
|
|
|
Post by slife on Dec 1, 2007 17:00:31 GMT -5
To me, it does not matter if a dial has lume or not. As long as the dial looks ok, I'm fine.
|
|
timebender
disciple
Bending a few in time.
Posts: 200
|
Post by timebender on Dec 2, 2007 9:48:19 GMT -5
I think it is better not to have it on a dress watch but on all others I want it. The problem I find most is how sorry the lume is on many brands.  When I really want to have one light up all night long say, when I am at a hotel and I want to have it on the night stand beside me I always go to one of my Seiko's. Out of every brand I own they are the only ones that consistently will lume all night long.  |
|
|
|
Post by duke6j on Dec 4, 2007 18:33:58 GMT -5
I second tbarry!
|
|
